Quantitative and Qualitative How smartphones influence teenagers in EF Research Paper

Quantitative and Qualitative How smartphones influence teenagers in EF Cambridge - Research Paper ExampleThe think will aim at carrying out a study of Smartphones in the teenage world. It will in addition aim at performing the study how Smartphones have affected the daily lives of teenagers at EF Cambridge.Teenagers feel that Smartphones wince their work load. For instance, Smartphones allow teenagers to slide their screens effortlessly rather than tapping keys like conventional phones. Smartphones have applications like facebook, twitter, whatsap, and former(a) social sites that help in the creation of new friendships (Zheng and Lionel 2006, p.1). Alternatively, Smartphones seem to have created more problems because teenagers have require lonesome, exposure to bullying, and exam cheating.The study gained more information from journals and books on Smartphones and their markets. The study used questionnaires as the important method of collecting data for the study. The questionn aires contained two sections the first section required teenagers at EF Cambridge to give their views toward the pros and cons of utilizing Smartphones. The back up section of the questionnaires required several(prenominal) teenagers who did not own Smartphones to give their reasons and the present trend of owning Smartphones. One deoxycytidine monophosphate and twenty (120) teenagers took part in the study but only 100 questionnaires were received.The study possessed several limitations. The data collected was inadequate to give a definite answer regarding the influence of smart phones amongst teenagers at EF Cambridge. The study occurred between 120 students whereby only 100 return their questionnaires. The number of participants was very small to comprise the high number of teenagers in EF Cambridge. Hingorani, Woodard, and Askari-Danesh (2012), p.33) all from Alabama State University discovered that smart phones have plow powerful gadgets amongst young people compared to com puters. Sarwar and Soomro (2013, 217) discovered that mobile communication has